The ODBA Father chimes in

Thanks, Chad.

Can we "disagree without being disagreeable"? I don't know.

But I'm trying.

What is immensely frustrating to me, as you may have gathered from my previous post, is the insinuation by some that because I disagree with their tactics I am somehow a "traitor to the cause," so to speak. I'm not. It's simply that their ways are not my ways, and I am not going to change that aspect of myself simply to please them.

Comments

[Raven]

1.

Feh...

This is why I tend to stay away from "alliances" of bloggers. Too much disagreement and not enough respect for others' points of view. It gets personal and nasty- recall The Wide Awakes. No thanks.

Happy New Year Kat!!! Have some wine for me!!

[Spank That Donkey]

2.

Ooooo, Waldo had two or three tastefully done photo shop parodies of him

The Horror....

Meanwhile he said what about Allen and Goode?

Rally to the side of the poor beat up Liberal Aggregate Editor, who never misses an opportunity to bash a Conservative !!!

That is our point Kat...

Take some time to think about it....

We questioned Waldo on his intent on silencing GGD, and then made some light hearted fun of him...

How was that 'uncivil'?, who said it was 'uncivil'

Every time a Conservative disagrees with a Liberal we the Conservatives are hate filled, mean spirited and uncivil.....

What in the heck?

[Kat]

3.

Who said it was 'uncivil'?

Precisely. I didn't say that here, neither did I mention it in my previous post. I stated my disagreement with your tactics, and further stated that those tactics were not my style.

I will yet further state, for the record, that there is a certain group of people, supposedly on the same side *I* am on, who are beginning to give me a deeper appreciation of what the Libs mean when they call us "Nazis."

Let me put it to you this way, STD: are you, or are you not, asking me to go against my conscience in my words and actions?

The Squeeky Wheel chimed in over at Shaun's place, and this is what he said:

I will say this: I was annoyed that Waldo 'banned' a blog because of a factual post of a factual event, but I have to be honest; I am now even more annoyed that I defended a blog (The Dog) and his 'lawyer' only to find out that these people were not who they said they were... Not even close. I am still waiting for my apology. In defending free speech, we were made fools of. Of course the left enjoyed 'outing' these bloggers and are reveling in the fact that we were duped by a 16-year-old because it distracted from the real issue of their desire to ignore terrorism, but the fact does not change that good posts were being put up by bad people.

Precisely.

Now stop beating me over the head: you're only pissing me off and making me dig my heels in further.

-- Kat