[source]
Because if you oppose THAT, then you're either a racist or a sexist - or both!
Let's see if the Liberal-Progressive-Nutcases are willing to subject themselves to the rules they themselves set up in 2008... My prediction? It'll be a very coooooooooold day in Hell...
I've said before that I'm leaning Bachmann-Cain, but I sure wouldn't mind Sarah Palin being on the ticket.
I agree with you; it's likely to be a polar day in the nether regions before libs agree that opposition to a Cain/Palin ticket would necessarily be both racist and sexist, though those are the metrics they applied to criticism of the Obama candidacy and presidency.
In liberal eyes, opposing Herman Cain wouldn't be racist, as he would be labeled some variety of "tom" or "oreo," and opposing Sarah Palin wouldn't be sexist because, as one feminist put it a few years ago (I'd give my eyeteeth right now to remember which one, but I can't), she isn't a real woman, that is, no real woman could possibly fail to support "reproductive rights" and other items on the feminist agenda.
With so many liberals, especially those on the Hard Left, it's always a game of "heads I win, tails you lose."
Posted by: Man of the West | July 12, 2011 at 11:27 PM